There is little doubt as to the influence of money on political campaigns. To run a successful campaign the candidates need funding. Campaigns must buy airtime, yard signs, bumper stickers, and pay campaign staff. Nothing in the world is free, so campaign contributions are a necessary evil.
Money has always been and will always be involved in politics. There is no way to remove it but we can diminish the stranglehold it has on our government.
The current campaign system has damaged our Government. The campaign the next election begins after the last vote is counted in the current election. Because of this constant need for money our government suffers. More time is spent on fundraising than working on government solutions. The public is feed up with this cycle and is reflected in the record low approval ratings.
The problem is the system
The two party system drives the problem of money in politics. Major contributors and societal sectors give to both parties. If you look at the website, opensecrets.org, you will see the money is given to both parties. By giving to both parties, they hold influence regardless of which party wins.
A majority of the contributions go to keep the status quo. In many donation sectors, more than 80% of the contributions go to the incumbent. This insulates incumbents from challenges from within their own party as well as the opposition.
Based on those facts, our elected officials have no real desire to address system of campaign funding. No matter what a politician tell you, it is a bad idea for politicians to make laws to "fix the broken rules." It's crazy to think elected politicians would really change the system which keeps them in power. They would be more likely to write rules to strengthen the ability of incumbents to stay in office. Need proof? All you have to do is look at gerrymandering of districts.
America is fed up with the system
American voters are losing themselves in a sea of despair. A recent report by Rasmussen states 80% of American voters believe the wealthy and special interest group have too much power and influence over elections.
American voters are quitting the process and that is not good. The PEW Research Center found American voter participation to be very low when compared to other countries. During the 2012 presidential election, less than 54% of voting age Americans actually participated in the election process. Less than 37% participated in the 2014 midterm elections.
Losing hope and quitting the system gives "big money" a win. Both political parties want voters to be less engaged. Large contributors want less citizen involvement to compete against.
This problem can be solved by adding more political parties into the system. Yes, you read that correctly!
Multiple parties are good…and not new to America!
America has the greatest diversity in the world. Yet currently we have the equivalent of a coin toss. A huge amount of money is spent on pushing out watered down political messages. For decades the message has been nothing more than "we're not them" rather than solutions to our problems.
Our two party political system is actually against the norm. Compared to the rest of the world, we have the fewest political parties involved in government. Our neighbors to the north and south have a greater amount of political diversity.
America's has not always been a two party system. At the start of the Second World War there were FIVE political parties represented in Congress. There is a long history of multiple parties in American government. Diversity of political parties was a source of strength for our nation. We should return to the strong system of political diversity.
American already wants more political parties. Opinion polls over the years have shown increasing support by Americans for a third party. A recent Salon poll showed nearly half of Americans desperately want additional political parties.
More choices will empower the citizen
A multi-party system would reduce the influence of big money. Like his policies or not, Bernie Sanders went from a joke of a candidate to the national stage. Initially, larger donors were not with him. His success was based off his message resonating with a section of American voters. Governor Gary Johnson is gaining public support as a candidate. Voters used to mock Libertarians and now they are being considered viable.
A multi-party system will bring government back into serving the people rather than themselves. Instead of an all or nothing system of politics, the art of sensible compromise would return to the halls of Congress.
A multi-party system would increase civic participation. The movements of Sanders, Stein, and Johnson are based off of dedicated smaller group participants. The message mattered greater than the money. Pundits are genuinely surprised at the amount of support being drained away from establishment candidates.
What can you do?
It starts with breaking the habit of shouting down someone who disagrees with you on a topic. If you refuse to listen to opinions you disagree with, you are contributing to the current problem.
Just because you disagree with someone on a specific issue does not mean you will disagree on everything they believe. And in the event you completely disagree with them on everything you hold valued, just let them be and move on.
Stop painting with a broad brush. The realm of political ideology is vast. Not everyone who disagrees with a progressive is a fascist. In turn, not everyone who disagrees with a conservative is a communist. Don't mislabel those whom you disagree. Your disagreement does not make you the authority on their political beliefs. If you disagree with a person, avoid the knee jerk reaction, "You're not X... you are REALLY just a Democrat/Republican.” No, understand their belief may be a mix of Libertarian, Green, Socialist Worker, or even a Modern Whig.
Who knows with time and an open mind, your long held beliefs just might change.